Apparently, solid proof has been confirmed by those close to Mississppi State's football program, which undeniably shows that Cam Newton's father(in every sense of the OJ Mayo type fatherly figure definition of the term), had developed a payment plan of 3 easy payments and sent confirmation of his short-term, short-sighted financial aspirations to MSU to let them know exactly how much more than just a scholarship it would take to get him to go to the land of the Cowbells... Just think, if MSU would have went along with the National Association of the Advancement of the Newtons plan, The Bulldogs would be enjoying an SEC championship and the strongest bid currently in the country to play for the National Championship.... So, Auburn is looking at a questionable superstar being eligible... But, my question is this, he didn't go to MSU, his dad is the only one on record(supposedly, although I strongly believe this is going to be the truth when it is finalized) asking for pay for his son to play, and so far there is no paper trail coming from the Athletic Department of Auburn showing any wrong-doing on their behalf, although, it would be hard to assume that one will not turn up.. In any event, if they have no proof of money being taken at Auburn, and the only two sides who have spoken of financial gain are Newton's father and some people with the interest of the MSU program in mind, how do you punish Newton and Auburn? without proof that Newton had any wrong-doing, other than being born to his father, then his eligibility should not come in to question. Remember, regardless of if Newton was the brain behind the 80,000 dollar QB Sack Pyramid , to date, no one can offer solid(recorded conversation or saved txt msgs and emails) in which Cam himself should not be punished for the actions of those claiming to represent him or his interests and wishes... That's just my take... Prove he asked for money, prove he got paid and the money was in his hand or that he freely invested(buying fancy cars, PS 3's and various Apple products) knowing the origins of said finances, and prove that Auburn supplied any money more than acceptable according to his scholarship expenses, then kill this issue now.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
That Boy is a P-I-G....PIG!
Apparently, solid proof has been confirmed by those close to Mississppi State's football program, which undeniably shows that Cam Newton's father(in every sense of the OJ Mayo type fatherly figure definition of the term), had developed a payment plan of 3 easy payments and sent confirmation of his short-term, short-sighted financial aspirations to MSU to let them know exactly how much more than just a scholarship it would take to get him to go to the land of the Cowbells... Just think, if MSU would have went along with the National Association of the Advancement of the Newtons plan, The Bulldogs would be enjoying an SEC championship and the strongest bid currently in the country to play for the National Championship.... So, Auburn is looking at a questionable superstar being eligible... But, my question is this, he didn't go to MSU, his dad is the only one on record(supposedly, although I strongly believe this is going to be the truth when it is finalized) asking for pay for his son to play, and so far there is no paper trail coming from the Athletic Department of Auburn showing any wrong-doing on their behalf, although, it would be hard to assume that one will not turn up.. In any event, if they have no proof of money being taken at Auburn, and the only two sides who have spoken of financial gain are Newton's father and some people with the interest of the MSU program in mind, how do you punish Newton and Auburn? without proof that Newton had any wrong-doing, other than being born to his father, then his eligibility should not come in to question. Remember, regardless of if Newton was the brain behind the 80,000 dollar QB Sack Pyramid , to date, no one can offer solid(recorded conversation or saved txt msgs and emails) in which Cam himself should not be punished for the actions of those claiming to represent him or his interests and wishes... That's just my take... Prove he asked for money, prove he got paid and the money was in his hand or that he freely invested(buying fancy cars, PS 3's and various Apple products) knowing the origins of said finances, and prove that Auburn supplied any money more than acceptable according to his scholarship expenses, then kill this issue now.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment